# HiClaw vs SpacetimeDB

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | SpacetimeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 5 892 | 25 418 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 ✓ | +96 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-spacetimedb