# HiClaw vs Paperless-ngx

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Paperless-ngx |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 47 203 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +1 247 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 26 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.3.4 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Paperless-ngx scores 86/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

Paperless-ngx ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Paperless-ngx needs more configuration.

Paperless-ngx is growing faster right now (+1 247 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Paperless-ngx](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperless-ngx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperless-ngx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-paperless-ngx