# HiClaw vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 65 374 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +320 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-nocodb