# HiClaw vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 ✓ | 4 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-motioneye