# HiClaw vs MCSManager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | MCSManager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 ✓ | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MCSManager scores 68/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-mcsmanager