# HiClaw vs LAN-Orangutan

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | LAN-Orangutan |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 ✓ | 1 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-lan-orangutan