# hestia vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hestia | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Control Panel | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 4 553 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.10.5 · 14 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

hestia scores 68/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

hestia ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

hestia is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hestia](https://selfhost.directory/project/hestia) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hestia.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hestia-vs-scada-lts