# hestia vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hestia | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Control Panel | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 4 552 | 132 646 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +3 289 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 1458 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.10.5 · 14 Sept 2026 | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 68/100 for hestia, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for hestia.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hestia](https://selfhost.directory/project/hestia) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hestia.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hestia-vs-llamacpp