hestiavsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hestia | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Control Panel | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 4 552 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 15 |
| Latest release | 1.10.5 · 14 Sept 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
hestia scores 68/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for hestia.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; hestia needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).
hestia details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep hestia, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with