hermes-agentvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hermes-agent | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 120 in AI Assistant | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 258 239 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 497 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.22.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
hermes-agent scores 89/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
hermes-agent ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, hermes-agent is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
hermes-agent is growing faster right now (+9 497 stars in 30 days).
hermes-agent details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep hermes-agent, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with