# hermes-agent vs octo-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hermes-agent | octo-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 120 in AI Assistant | #37 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 258 015 ✓ | 1 101 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 592 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.22.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.24.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

hermes-agent scores 89/100 against 53/100 for octo-server, so it is the safer default.

hermes-agent ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for octo-server.

If you want the quickest setup, hermes-agent is easier to run; octo-server needs more configuration.

hermes-agent is growing faster right now (+9 592 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hermes-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/hermes-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hermes-agent.md)
- [octo-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/octo-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octo-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hermes-agent-vs-octo-server