# heplify vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | heplify | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 222 | 24 063 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +785 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2.0.28 · 4 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 49/100 for heplify, so it is the safer default.

temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [heplify](https://selfhost.directory/project/heplify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/heplify.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/heplify-vs-temporal