# heplify vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | heplify | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 222 | 35 799 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +838 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.0.28 · 4 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 49/100 for heplify, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for heplify.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; heplify needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [heplify](https://selfhost.directory/project/heplify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/heplify.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/heplify-vs-seaweedfs