# Healthchecks vs yoink

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | yoink |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #97 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 ✓ | 150 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 45/100 for yoink, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for yoink.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; yoink needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [yoink](https://selfhost.directory/project/yoink-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yoink-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-yoink-2