# Healthchecks vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 ✓ | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-workout-cool