# Healthchecks vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-windows-arm