# Healthchecks vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-wildbox