# Healthchecks vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 17 478 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +493 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Wazuh scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

Wazuh is growing faster right now (+493 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-wazuh