# Healthchecks vs wanderer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 ✓ | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +131 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [wanderer](https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-wanderer