# Healthchecks vs 墨台 · VibeHolding

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | 墨台 · VibeHolding |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 ✓ | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [墨台 · VibeHolding](https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-vibe-holding