# Healthchecks vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-uusec-waf