# Healthchecks vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UrBackup.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-urbackup