# Healthchecks vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-transfersh