# Healthchecks vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-tradingagents