# Healthchecks vs tiledesk

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | tiledesk |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #46 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.2.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Mustache |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 51/100 for tiledesk, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tiledesk.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; tiledesk needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [tiledesk](https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-tiledesk