# Healthchecks vs Taskwarrior

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Taskwarrior |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 15 in Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 ✓ | 6 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 68/100 for Taskwarrior, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Taskwarrior.

If you want the quickest setup, Taskwarrior is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Taskwarrior](https://selfhost.directory/project/taskwarrior) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/taskwarrior.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-taskwarrior