# Healthchecks vs Tailscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 38 221 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +1 416 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 416 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-tailscale