# Healthchecks vs Spoolman

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Spoolman |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 ✓ | 2 955 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +109 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.27.0 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 65/100 for Spoolman, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Spoolman.

If you want the quickest setup, Spoolman is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Spoolman](https://selfhost.directory/project/spoolman) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spoolman.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-spoolman