# Healthchecks vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +116 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-scanopy