# Healthchecks vs scalar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | scalar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 16 337 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +148 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 46 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | release-2026-10-28-0d01943 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

scalar scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

scalar ships more often: 46 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

If you want the quickest setup, scalar is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [scalar](https://selfhost.directory/project/scalar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scalar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-scalar