# Healthchecks vs Rejourney

> Two self-hosted [Sentry alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/sentry), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Rejourney |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #16 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rejourney.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Rejourney](https://selfhost.directory/project/rejourney) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rejourney.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-rejourney