# Healthchecks vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 44 977 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +1 604 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 604 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-reactive-resume