# Healthchecks vs Project OSRM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Project OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 ✓ | 8 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-project-osrm