# Healthchecks vs PixelFed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | PixelFed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #11 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 ✓ | 7 131 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for PixelFed, so it is the safer default.

PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [PixelFed](https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-pixelfed