# Healthchecks vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 61 527 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +483 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Pi-hole.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-pi-hole