# Healthchecks vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 91 931 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +490 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+490 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-paddleocr