# Healthchecks vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-openreader