# Healthchecks vs OpenMapTiles

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | OpenMapTiles |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 ✓ | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +40 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | PLpgSQL |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-openmaptiles