# Healthchecks vs OmniTools

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | OmniTools |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 10 511 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +264 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 72/100 for OmniTools, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-omnitools