# Healthchecks vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 ✓ | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-mqttx-web