# Healthchecks vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 132 699 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +3 244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-llamacpp