# Healthchecks vs Kestra

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Healthchecks | Kestra |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 30 059 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +1 724 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 59 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Kestra scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)
- [Kestra](https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kestra vs prefect](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-prefect)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/healthchecks-vs-kestra