# headscale vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | headscale | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 31 in Networking | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 45 143 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 073 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

headscale scores 82/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for headscale.

If you want the quickest setup, headscale is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

headscale is growing faster right now (+1 073 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [headscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/headscale-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s