# headscale vs Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | headscale | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 31 in Networking | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 45 145 ✓ | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 075 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

headscale scores 82/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.

headscale ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).

If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; headscale needs more configuration.

headscale is growing faster right now (+1 075 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [headscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale.md)
- [Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/headscale-vs-wrp