# headscale vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | headscale | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 31 in Networking | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 45 171 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 064 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

headscale scores 82/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for headscale.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; headscale needs more configuration.

headscale is growing faster right now (+1 064 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [headscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/headscale-vs-unbagrnd