# headscale vs Request Tracker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | headscale | Request Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 31 in Networking | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 45 162 ✓ | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

headscale scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.

headscale ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.

If you want the quickest setup, headscale is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

headscale is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [headscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale.md)
- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/headscale-vs-request-tracker