Headplanevsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Headplane | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 34 in Network Management | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 3 222 | 12 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +196 | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Headplane and illa-builder score the same (67/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Headplane ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, Headplane is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
Headplane is growing faster right now (+196 stars in 30 days).
Headplane details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep Headplane, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with