# hatsu vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hatsu | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Fediverse | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 258 | 15 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +43 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.5 · 1 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 45/100 for hatsu, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hatsu.

If you want the quickest setup, hatsu is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hatsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/hatsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hatsu.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hatsu-vs-peertube