# hastic-server vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hastic-server | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #87 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 38 961 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 39/100 for hastic-server, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; hastic-server needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hastic-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hastic-server-vs-searxng