hastic-servervsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hastic-server | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #87 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 38 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 390 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 39/100 for hastic-server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; hastic-server needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 390 stars in 30 days).
hastic-server details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep hastic-server, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with